Technical Data
Port Specifications
- UNLOCODE
- USLAX
- Port Type
- Container
- Terminals
- 7
- Berth Count
- 25
- Max Draught
- 16.2 m
- Country
- 🇺🇸 USA
Conditions
Current Weather
Overview
About This Port
The busiest container port in the Western Hemisphere, located in San Pedro Bay. Handles more than a third of all containerized imports to the United States.
Location
Coordinates
33.7500°N, 118.2500°W
View on Google Maps →External Resources
Official Website
Live Data
Port Congestion
30-Day Berth Occupancy Trend
Waiting Vessels Trend
Port-call activity
Arrivals, time in port and cargo operations detected from AIS — the position-inferred congestion signal, with the full dwell distribution rather than a single average.
- in port
- · 39 h
- · 8 h
- · 17 h
- · 3.0 d
- · 43 h
- · 4.2 d
- · 24 h
- · 42 h
- in port
- · 4.8 d
- in port
- in port
- · 19 h
- · 2.9 d
- · 40 h
- · 18 h
- in port
- · 2.9 d
Expected arrivals
5 inboundVessels underway broadcasting a destination that resolves to this port, closest first. Distance is the real sea route (around land and through canals); the computed ETA is at the vessel’s passage speed. The crew’s own reported ETA is shown alongside for comparison.
| Vessel | Type | Distance | Speed | ETA (computed) | Crew ETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REN JIAN 20 | Container Ship | 85 nm | 17.6 kn | 30 Jun | 30 Jun |
| CAPE TAINARO | Container Ship | 1005 nm | 18.3 kn | 2 Jul | 2 Jul |
| SAGA ANDORINHA | General Cargo | 1071 nm | 9.7 kn | 4 Jul | 4 Jul |
| PRESIDENT LB JOHNSON | Container Ship | ~4781 nm | 13.2 kn | — | 11 Jul |
| PRESIDENT CARTER | Container Ship | ~4782 nm | 12.9 kn | — | 2 Jul |
Network
Connectivity & hub role
How central Port of Los Angeles sits in the sea-route network we cover — a connectivity score across navigable distances. A higher score means the port is navigationally close to many other well-connected ports, the maritime signature of a hub.
Directly routable to 178 other covered ports.
- USSan Francisco400 nm
- CAPort of Vancouver1,250 nm
- PABalboa2,971 nm
- COPort of Cartagena3,299 nm
- ECGuayaquil3,308 nm
- COSanta Marta3,395 nm
- JMPort Antonio3,599 nm
- PECallao3,652 nm
Method. A connectivity score across our own route network: a port reads higher when it is navigationally close to many other well-connected ports. The score is rescaled 0–100 within the snapshot, so the single most-connected port reads 100. Distances are Suez / Panama / Malacca-aware navigable sea miles.
Coverage. The route network spans the 180 largest commercial ports, so this ranks hubs within that covered network, not against every port on earth. The number is deterministic — no confidence grade is invented. Computed Jun 30, 2026.
Risk & quality
Port risk & quality
A coverage-weighted blend of recorded Port-State-Control detentions, marine casualties and live congestion at Port of Los Angeles. Higher means more risk exposure for a ship calling here — it is a count of recorded events, not a judgement of the port's management.
Built from 33% of the three signals (scored on a single signal — treat as indicative).
Method. Each signal is normalised to 0–10 against an empirical cap, then blended weighting safety (detentions 0.40, casualties 0.35) above operational congestion (0.25). A port is scored only on the signals it has data for, and the weights renormalise — a missing signal is never credited as a safe 0.
Coverage. PSC and casualty data here is regional (US, UK, Canada), so most ports show only congestion and carry a low-confidence flag. Detention/casualty counts come from a country-scoped name match (≈60% of US detentions resolve); unmatched records are dropped, not force-fit.
Detention and casualty signals are screened against open port-state-control and marine-casualty records, combined with our own AIS-derived congestion. Updated Jun 23, 2026.
Community
Port Comments