General Cargo🇷🇺 RussiaActive

AQUILON

Compare

IMO: 9190286
MMSI: 273354390
Call Sign: UGZM

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

6,540GT

Deadweight

9,200DWT

Length Overall

134.5m

Beam

16.5m

Draught

3.9m

Year Built

1999

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreCritical

25/ 100

Safety48

Compliance5

Environment48

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties2

PERSON SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED - In contact with any part of the ship or its contentsSerious
Dec 5, 2010BECANCOUR, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 05 December 2010, the 2nd Officer of the "MICHIGANBORG", berthed at Bécancour, Quebec, injured his ankle when falling down on the deck covered with snow.
INTENTIONAL BEACHING/GROUNDING/ANCHORING to avoid occurrenceMinor
Sep 21, 2004CANAL DE LA RIVE SUD, QUEBEC (QC)
On 21 September 2004, the upbound vessel Michiganborg showed hard port on the rudder angle indicator irregardless of rudder position. The vessel went to emergency anchorage.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

87/100

High risk80% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or a dark-fleet signal.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposure100

Dark-fleet signal100

Hull age88

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 4 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~9,200t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 3.9 m · 21 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

2.73 m~6,747 t

2.93 m~7,156 t

3.12 m~7,565 t

3.32 m~7,974 t

3.51 m~8,382 t

3.7 m~8,791 t

3.9 m~9,200 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

AIS gapcriticalstrength 1.00

Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front

Jun 23, 2026

On Sanctions List: yes
Regimes: Canada,OFAC

Method: vessel is on a sanctions list but has never appeared on our live AIS feed. Source: ais_positions (absence) + sanctioned_vessels.

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial