TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Ro-Ro or Passenger Ship🇨🇦 CanadaActive

ARMAND IMBEAU II

IMO
9703215
MMSI
316030213
Call Sign
CFA2686

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
2,903GT
Deadweight
1,500DWT
Length Overall
92m
Beam
27m
Year Built
2018

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreLow
90/ 100
Safety88
Compliance95
Environment88

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties7
  • PERSON OVERBOARDMinor
    Aug 19, 2023Pointe de l'Anse à l'Eau, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 19 August 2023, the ferry "ARMAND-IMBEAU II", with 146 people on board, reported one of its passengers overboard in Saguenay River, QC. The passenger was recovered and transferred to a medical team in Tadoussac, QC.

  • SUSTAINS DAMAGE RENDER UNSEAWORTHY/UNFIT FOR PURPOSE - Unfit for purpose - ice, weather, etc.Serious
    Oct 26, 2021Tadoussac, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 26 October 2021, the ferry "ARMAND-IMBEAU II" reported experiencing propulsion control problems in Tadoussac, QC. The vessel docked in Tadoussac, QC to assess the problem.

  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Sep 6, 2020Baie-Sainte-Catherine, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 06 September 2020, the passenger ferry "ARMAND-IMBEAU II" experienced a problem with its propulsion upon arrival in Baie-Sainte-Catherine, QC. The ferry proceeded to Tadoussac, QC for further investigation.

  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Jun 17, 2020Tadoussac, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 17 June 2020, the ferry "ARMAND-IMBEAU II" sustained a failure of its propulsion electronic controls. The ferry docked in Tadoussac, QC to await spare parts to conduct the repairs.

  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Dec 12, 2019Tadoussac, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 12 December 2019, the ferry "ARMAND-IMBEAU II" reported the failure of its aft azipod. The vessel proceeded to the lay-up berth in Tadoussac, QC, the crew carried out the repairs, and the vessel resumed its operations.

  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Nov 5, 2019Tadoussac, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 05 November 2019, the passenger ferry "ARMAND-IMBEAU II" reported the failure of its forward propulsion system off Tadoussac, QC. The ferry proceeded to Tadoussac, QC to carry out repairs.

  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Aug 30, 2019Baie-Sainte-Catherine, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 30 August 2019, the ferry "ARMAND-IMBEAU II" reported a failure of the stern azipod during operations in Baie-Sainte-Catherine, QC.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

17/100
Low riskLow confidence40% component coverage

No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age12
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~1,500t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 3.93 m · 6 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
2.75 m~794 t
2.95 m~911 t
3.15 m~1,029 t
3.34 m~1,147 t
3.54 m~1,265 t
3.74 m~1,382 t
3.93 m~1,500 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 1,500 DWT · ~9 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments