TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Floating Storage or Production🇬🇧 United KingdomActive

BW SINGAPORE

IMO
9684495
MMSI
235113083
Call Sign
2IVG6

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
106,793GT
Deadweight
87,233DWT
Length Overall
292.57m
Beam
43.4m
Year Built
2015

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 22 h ago
Track · last 11 d
Position
44.464°N · 12.397°E
Speed
0.0 kn
Course
127°
Status
Moored
Destination ITRAVETA Jun 10, 03:00 PMDraught 10.3 m

Where it waited most

Most time stopped at Ravenna 2 h across 1 stay.

  1. 1

Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$32.5Mrange $26.9M$49.7M
$373/dwt · 87,233 dwt · built 2015
high confidence · 38 comps
Comparable sales
ARISTARCHOS 2017 · $44MHAFNIA YANGTZE 2009 · $20MHAFNIA ZAMBESI 2010 · $20MFULHAM ROAD 2013 · $44.6MBANI YAS 2010 · $22MYAMILAH-III 2011 · $22M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$39.9Mrange $35.3M$44.2M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow
84/ 100
Safety78
Compliance95
Environment78
Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (69% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Operational Status

Activity

Idle / at anchorLow confidenceFix 10 days ago

Stopped, anchored or moored on its latest broadcast — parked, not necessarily withdrawn.

Speed
0.0 kn
Nav status
At anchor
Last broadcast
10 days ago
Hull age
11 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

30/100
Moderate risk60% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal50
Hull age24
Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~87,233t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 13.67 m · 80.5 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
9.57 m~54,204 t
10.26 m~59,709 t
10.94 m~65,214 t
11.62 m~70,719 t
12.31 m~76,223 t
12.99 m~81,728 t
13.67 m~87,233 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.82 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit; beam/LOA=0.148 is fine-lined

DWT/GT 0.82Beam/LOA 0.148Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchmediumstrength 0.68

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
0.683
Beam Loa Ratio
0.148
Deadweight
87,233
Declared Class
TANKER
Declared Type
Floating Storage or Production
Dwt Gt Ratio
0.817
Gross Tonnage
106,793
Reason
declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.82 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit; beam/LOA=0.148 is fine-lined
Size Implied Class
GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 87,233 DWT · ~38 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments