Heavy Lift Vessel🇳🇱 NetherlandsActive

FORTUNAGRACHT

Compare

IMO: 9507609
MMSI: 246621000
Call Sign: PBUU

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

8,620GT

Deadweight

12,178DWT

Length Overall

137.07m

Beam

19.11m

Draught

7.8m

Year Built

2012

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreLow

84/ 100

Safety78

Compliance95

Environment78

Carbon intensity · 2024D

5,055t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 14.9
Fuel burned: 1,620 t
Technical: EEXI (8.93 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties4

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Apr 27, 2024Pointe Noire, QUEBEC (QC)
On 27 April 2024, the cargo ship "FORTUNAGRACHT" reported having sustained a total failure of its main engine while anchored in Baie de Sept-Îles, QC. The vessel remained anchored while awaiting for tug assistance in order to proceed alongside in Sept-Îles, QC for repairs.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Apr 30, 2021Lancaster, ONTARIO (ON)
On 30 April 2021, the general cargo vessel "FORTUNAGRACHT", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported sustaining a machinery failure which caused a blackout in the St. Lawrence Seaway off Lancaster, ON. The crew restarted the engines and sailed to the Pointe Fortier Anchorage off Beauharnois, QC. Once repaired, the vessel was able to resume its voyage.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Jun 16, 2020Cap-Tourmente, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 16 June 2020, the general cargo ship "FORTUNAGRACHT", under the conduct of a pilot, reported a problem with its main engine and proceeded to anchorage off Cap-Tourmente, QC. The vessel later reported that the problem was caused by human error, and the vessel resumed its voyage.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Sep 10, 2019Montréal, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 10 September 2019, the general cargo ship "FORTUNAGRACHT", under the conduct of a pilot, reported being disabled due to a main engine problem at section 72 of the port of Montreal, QC. The crew carried out repairs and the vessel returned to service.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

22/100

Low riskLow confidence40% component coverage

No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age36

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~12,178t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 7.8 m · 23.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

5.46 m~6,729 t

5.85 m~7,637 t

6.24 m~8,545 t

6.63 m~9,453 t

7.02 m~10,362 t

7.41 m~11,270 t

7.8 m~12,178 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial