TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Floating Storage or Production🇮🇹 ItalyActive

FSRU TOSCANA

IMO
9253284
MMSI
247323700
Call Sign
IBAH

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
117,916GT
Deadweight
73,736DWT
Length Overall
306.47m
Beam
48m
Draught
24.1m
Year Built
2003

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 11 h ago
Track · last 13 d
Position
43.643°N · 9.987°E
Speed
0.1 kn
Course
343°
Status
At anchor
Destination IT LIVBallast · 8.8 m

Where it waited most

Most time stopped at Livorno 9 d across 3 stays.

  1. 1
    Livorno9 d · 3×

Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$18.2Mrange $12.7M$20.2M
$247/dwt · 73,736 dwt · built 2003
high confidence · 37 comps
Comparable sales
CAPE TAMPA 2009 · $20MCAPE TAFT 2008 · $20MPLOUTOS 2006 · $13.5MVOULA 2009 · $25MCHEMTRANS CANCALE 2007 · $12MHAMBURG STAR 2005 · $10M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$14Mrange $10.8M$19.8M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
71/ 100
Safety58
Compliance95
Environment58
Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (46% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Operational Status

Activity

Idle / at anchorFix within the last day

Stopped, anchored or moored on its latest broadcast — parked, not necessarily withdrawn.

Speed
0.0 kn
Nav status
At anchor
Last broadcast
within the last day
Hull age
23 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

60/100
Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal80
Hull age72
Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~73,736t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 24.1 m · 71.9 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
16.87 m~21,734 t
18.08 m~30,401 t
19.28 m~39,068 t
20.49 m~47,735 t
21.69 m~56,402 t
22.9 m~65,069 t
24.1 m~73,736 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.63 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit

DWT/GT 0.63Beam/LOA 0.157Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 1.00

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
1
Beam Loa Ratio
0.157
Deadweight
73,736
Declared Class
TANKER
Declared Type
Floating Storage or Production
Dwt Gt Ratio
0.625
Gross Tonnage
117,916
Reason
declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.63 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit
Size Implied Class
GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 73,736 DWT · ~30 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments