TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Container Ship🇵🇦 PanamaActive

HAI SHUN FENG 27

IMO
8357007
MMSI
352001753
Call Sign
3E2590

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
10,844GT
Deadweight
21,133DWT
Length Overall
156m
Beam
21m
Year Built
2012

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$13.2Mrange $12.6M$14.9M
$626/dwt · 21,133 dwt · built 2012
medium confidence · 6 comps
Comparable sales
WARNOW CHIEF 2009 · $11MQUEZON BRIDGE 2009 · $15.5MCAPE FARO 2006 · $14.5MLUDWIG SCHULTE 2008 · $14.5MHANSA WOLFSBURG 2007 · $14.1MTURKON ISTANBUL 2008 · $16.5M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow
84/ 100
Safety78
Compliance95
Environment78
Carbon intensity · estimatedD

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band D from its segment, size and age (71% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

64/100
Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal80
Hull age36
Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~21,133t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 8.76 m · 38.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
6.13 m~11,110 t
6.57 m~12,781 t
7.01 m~14,451 t
7.45 m~16,122 t
7.89 m~17,792 t
8.32 m~19,463 t
8.76 m~21,133 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Container
Inferred from size
Bulker

declared container but density DWT/GT=1.95 is at/above the heavy-cargo cut 1.55 — volume carriers (container/gas) sit below ~1.5; reads bulker/tanker

DWT/GT 1.95Beam/LOA 0.135Declared type: Container Ship

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 1.00

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
0.997
Beam Loa Ratio
0.135
Deadweight
21,133
Declared Class
CONTAINER
Declared Type
Container Ship
Dwt Gt Ratio
1.949
Gross Tonnage
10,844
Reason
declared container but density DWT/GT=1.95 is at/above the heavy-cargo cut 1.55 — volume carriers (container/gas) sit below ~1.5; reads bulker/tanker
Size Implied Class
BULKER

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 21,133 DWT · ~17 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments