Container Ship🇨🇳 ChinaActive

HE HONG

Compare

IMO: 8860066
MMSI: 412437390
Call Sign: BKUG4

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

4,607GT

Deadweight

8,276DWT

Length Overall

105.8m

Beam

20m

Year Built

2005

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$15.3Mrange $4.8M – $15.3M

$1,845/dwt · 8,276 dwt · built 2005

low confidence · 2 comps

Comparable sales

A SUKAI 2007 · $4.8MATLANTIC HORIZON 2006 · $12.3M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance94

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (89% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

57/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal80

Hull age64

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~8,276t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 6.69 m · 19.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

4.68 m~4,311 t

5.02 m~4,972 t

5.35 m~5,633 t

5.68 m~6,294 t

6.02 m~6,954 t

6.35 m~7,615 t

6.69 m~8,276 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Bulker

declared container but density DWT/GT=1.80 is at/above the heavy-cargo cut 1.55 — volume carriers (container/gas) sit below ~1.5; reads bulker/tanker; beam/LOA=0.189 is beamy (bulker-like)

DWT/GT 1.8Beam/LOA 0.189Declared type: Container Ship

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 0.72

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.716
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.189
Deadweight: 8,276
Declared Class: CONTAINER
Declared Type: Container Ship
Dwt Gt Ratio: 1.796
Gross Tonnage: 4,607
Reason: declared container but density DWT/GT=1.80 is at/above the heavy-cargo cut 1.55 — volume carriers (container/gas) sit below ~1.5; reads bulker/tanker; beam/LOA=0.189 is beamy (bulker-like)
Size Implied Class: BULKER

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial