TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Container Ship🇯🇵 JapanActive

HIYODORI

IMO
8731411
MMSI
431000132
Call Sign
JD2366

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
749GT
Deadweight
1,830DWT
Length Overall
96.81m
Beam
14m
Draught
4.2m
Year Built
2007

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 15 h ago
Track · last 12 d
Position
35.374°N · 139.725°E
Speed
0.3 kn
Course
284°
Status
Under way using engine

Where it waited most

Most time stopped at Kawasaki 12 h across 1 stay.

  1. 1

Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreMedium
77/ 100
Safety68
Compliance95
Environment68
Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (99% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Operational Status

Activity

Idle / at anchorFix within the last day

Stopped, anchored or moored on its latest broadcast — parked, not necessarily withdrawn.

Speed
0.1 kn
Nav status
Under way using engine
Last broadcast
within the last day
Hull age
19 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

54/100
Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal80
Hull age56
Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~1,830t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 4.2 m · 7.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
2.94 m~853 t
3.15 m~1,016 t
3.36 m~1,179 t
3.57 m~1,342 t
3.78 m~1,504 t
3.99 m~1,667 t
4.2 m~1,830 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Container
Inferred from size
Container

density DWT/GT=2.44 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared container) — likely a tonnage data error

DWT/GT 2.44Beam/LOA 0.145Declared type: Container Ship

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 0.95

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
0.95
Beam Loa Ratio
0.145
Deadweight
1,830
Declared Class
CONTAINER
Declared Type
Container Ship
Dwt Gt Ratio
2.443
Gross Tonnage
749
Reason
density DWT/GT=2.44 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared container) — likely a tonnage data error
Size Implied Class
CONTAINER

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 1,830 DWT · ~9 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments