TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Chemical Tanker🇹🇻 TuvaluActive

JUPITER

IMO
9185487
MMSI
572740210
Call Sign
T2SC4

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
27,185GT
Deadweight
48,338DWT
Length Overall
182m
Beam
32.2m
Draught
11.6m
Year Built
2000

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$14.3Mrange $11M$16.5M
$296/dwt · 48,338 dwt · built 2000
high confidence · 53 comps
Comparable sales
PIGEON POINT 2005 · $13.8MSAN FERNANDO 2005 · $12MJAG POOJA 2005 · $11MFLORENCE 2006 · $11.1MMINERVA LYDIA 2004 · $10.4MJAG PADMA 2005 · $16M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$9.5Mrange $7.6M$11.9M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
64/ 100
Safety48
Compliance93
Environment48
Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (49% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

60/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age84
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~48,338t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.6 m · 52.5 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
8.12 m~30,054 t
8.7 m~33,101 t
9.28 m~36,149 t
9.86 m~39,196 t
10.44 m~42,243 t
11.02 m~45,291 t
11.6 m~48,338 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.78 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.78Beam/LOA 0.177Declared type: Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 48,338 DWT · ~30 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments