Floating Storage or Production🇦🇴 AngolaActive

KIZOMBA A FPSO

Built by HD Hyundai Mipo in 2004

Compare

IMO: 8765292
MMSI: 603500186
Call Sign: KZAFPSO

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

187,864GT

Deadweight

340,660DWT

Length Overall

285.04m

Beam

63m

Year Built

2004

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$50.9Mrange $45.1M – $60.2M

$149/dwt · 340,660 dwt · built 2004

high confidence · 51 comps

Comparable sales

MARAN ARIES 2006 · $45MMARAN CANOPUS 2007 · $49MOCEANIC FORTUNE 2010 · $57MSHAYBAH 2008 · $59MMADESTA 2005 · $40MGOLD PEARL 2005 · $29.5M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$48.5Mrange $39.7M – $56.7M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

62/ 100

Safety58

Compliance70

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedA

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band A from its segment, size and age (78% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

50/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal50

Hull age68

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~340,660t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 20.9 m · 200.9 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

14.63 m~214,719 t

15.67 m~235,709 t

16.72 m~256,699 t

17.76 m~277,689 t

18.81 m~298,680 t

19.85 m~319,670 t

20.9 m~340,660 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.81 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.81Beam/LOA 0.221Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Flag hoppingmediumstrength 0.50

Repeated flag changes or an MMSI-country vs. registered-flag mismatch

Jun 23, 2026

Change Count: 2
Threshold: 2

Flag sequence

2005-05-18China→Norway· Clarkson Research
2019-05-19United Kingdom→Denmark· TradeWinds

Method: count of recorded registered-flag changes in vessel_history. Source: vessel_history (Clarkson/Equasis/TradeWinds/Lloyd's-sourced flag events).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Transparency

Flag history

Every recorded change of registered flag for this vessel. None of these changes matched a risk pattern. Re-flagging is a normal commercial act; this is an informational record, not a determination of wrongdoing.

United Kingdom→Denmark
May 19, 2019
Source: TradeWinds.
China→Norway
May 18, 2005
Source: Clarkson Research.

Flag changes are taken verbatim from the vessel's recorded history; the “flagged” marker is a transparent rule over a public open-registry list and a documented re-flagging cadence, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial