TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Ro-Ro Cargo🇨🇲 CameroonActive

LIDER HALUK

Built by Rauma-Repola in 1985

IMO
8404276
MMSI
613744000
Call Sign
TJMC741

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
10,215GT
Deadweight
9,334DWT
Length Overall
134.6m
Beam
21.04m
Draught
4.5m
Year Built
1985

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreCritical
37/ 100
Safety38
Compliance35
Environment38
Carbon intensity · 2024A
5,669t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
18.3
Fuel burned
1,768 t
Technical
EEXI (17.68 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1
  • SUSTAINS DAMAGE RENDER UNSEAWORTHY/UNFIT FOR PURPOSE - Unfit for purpose - ice, weather, etc.Serious
    Feb 15, 2001BAIE COMEAU, QUÉBEC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 15 February 2001, the master of the "DEGERO" became aware of cracks in no4 DB ballast tank. Repairs were undertaken in Baie-Comeau on 22 February 2001.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

70/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age100
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~9,334t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 4.5 m · 21.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
3.15 m~6,475 t
3.38 m~6,952 t
3.6 m~7,428 t
3.82 m~7,905 t
4.05 m~8,381 t
4.27 m~8,858 t
4.5 m~9,334 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 9,334 DWT · ~9 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments