Floating Storage or Production🇭🇷 CroatiaActive

LNG CROATIA

Compare

IMO: 9256767
MMSI: 238048000
Call Sign: 9A2575

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

97,178GT

Deadweight

79,950DWT

Length Overall

280m

Beam

43.04m

Draught

9.9m

Year Built

2005

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$19.8Mrange $14.4M – $21.9M

$248/dwt · 79,950 dwt · built 2005

high confidence · 41 comps

Comparable sales

HAFNIA SHINANO 2008 · $15MHAFNIA YANGTZE 2009 · $20MDANSHIP TOPE 2008 · $19MHAFNIA ZAMBESI 2010 · $20MPELAGIC TOPE 2008 · $13.8MNAVE ARIADNE 2007 · $22.5M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$18.9Mrange $15.5M – $25.8M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (67% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

44/100

Moderate risk60% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal50

Hull age64

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~79,950t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 9.9 m · 103.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

6.93 m~49,343 t

7.43 m~54,444 t

7.92 m~59,546 t

8.42 m~64,647 t

8.91 m~69,748 t

9.41 m~74,849 t

9.9 m~79,950 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.82 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit

DWT/GT 0.82Beam/LOA 0.154Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchmediumstrength 0.57

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.568
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.154
Deadweight: 79,950
Declared Class: TANKER
Declared Type: Floating Storage or Production
Dwt Gt Ratio: 0.823
Gross Tonnage: 97,178
Reason: declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.82 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit
Size Implied Class: GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial