Container Ship🇵🇦 PanamaActive

MAERSK ARAS

Compare

IMO: 9624275
MMSI: 351977000
Call Sign: 3FGH2

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

45,169GT

Deadweight

60,153DWT

Length Overall

255.17m

Beam

37.5m

Draught

12.9m

Year Built

2013

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$52.1Mrange $52M – $57.3M

$867/dwt · 60,153 dwt · built 2013

high confidence · 12 comps

Comparable sales

HYUNDAI PRESTIGE 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PARAMOUNT 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PLATINUM 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PREMIUM 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PRIVILEGE 2013 · $60MGENOA EXPRESS 2014 · $45M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow

84/ 100

Safety78

Compliance95

Environment78

Carbon intensity · estimatedB

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band B from its segment, size and age (54% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

COLLISION - Struck by vesselModerate
Aug 8, 2017Vancouver, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 08 August 2017, the tug "SST ORLEANS", with 2 people on board, collided with the container vessel "MAERSK ARAS" while assisting in its departure from Centerm 5 terminal, Vancouver, BC. Damage to the tug was reported.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

49/100

Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age32

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~60,153t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 12.9 m · 74.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

9.03 m~31,423 t

9.68 m~36,212 t

10.32 m~41,000 t

10.97 m~45,788 t

11.61 m~50,576 t

12.25 m~55,365 t

12.9 m~60,153 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.33 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.33Beam/LOA 0.147Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial