Container Ship🇸🇬 SingaporeActive

MAERSK NAMIBIA

Compare

IMO: 9289180
MMSI: 566415000
Call Sign: 9V9863

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

24,488GT

Deadweight

28,936DWT

Length Overall

195m

Beam

32.2m

Draught

10m

Year Built

2004

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$18.1Mrange $15M – $20.5M

$626/dwt · 28,936 dwt · built 2004

high confidence · 14 comps

Comparable sales

NEWNEW MOON 1999 · $10.5MXUTRA BHUM 2005 · $20MWANA BHUM 2005 · $20MTURKON ISTANBUL 2008 · $16.5MPUERTO LIMON EXPRESS 2009 · $32MSANTA MARTA EXPRESS 2010 · $32M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · 2024D

938t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 14.3
Fuel burned: 300 t
Technical: EEXI (17.6 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties3

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Dec 10, 2019Les Escoumins, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 10 December 2019, the container vessel "SAFMARINE CAMEROUN" sustained the failure of one of its main engine auxiliary blowers and proceeded on its own power to the Les Rasades anchorage to carry out the repairs.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Aug 31, 2019Montreal, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 31 August 2019, the container ship "SAFMARINE CAMEROUN", under the conduct of a pilot, reported a problem with its main engine on its departure from section 60 of the port of Montreal, QC. The crew carried out repairs and the vessel proceeded to sea.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Feb 20, 2019Les Escoumins Pilot Station, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 20 February 2019, the container vessel "SAFMARINE CAMEROUN" was reported disabled in the St. Lawrence River 6.5 nautical miles ENE of Les Escoumins, QC. The crew carried out repairs while the vessel was drifting and the vessel resumed its voyage.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

61/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age68

Flag register50

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~28,936t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 10 m · 46.7 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7 m~14,935 t

7.5 m~17,268 t

8 m~19,602 t

8.5 m~21,935 t

9 m~24,269 t

9.5 m~26,602 t

10 m~28,936 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.18 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.18Beam/LOA 0.165Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial