Container Ship🇵🇦 PanamaActive

MAERSK PUELO

Compare

IMO: 9306172
MMSI: 353117000
Call Sign: 3EPS9

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

73,934GT

Deadweight

81,250DWT

Length Overall

304.14m

Beam

40m

Draught

6.4m

Year Built

2006

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$30.7Mrange $2.2M – $30.7M

$378/dwt · 81,250 dwt · built 2006

low confidence · 2 comps

Comparable sales

BRUSSELS 2000 · $26MMSC TIA V 2002 · $1.6M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

77/ 100

Safety68

Compliance95

Environment68

Carbon intensity · 2024C

48,100t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 10.3
Fuel burned: 15,583 t
Technical: EIV (28.85 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

INTENTIONAL BEACHING/GROUNDING/ANCHORING to avoid occurrenceModerate
Mar 31, 2017First Narrows, Vancouver, BC, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 31 March 2017, the container vessel "PUELO", under conduct of a pilot, reported a machinery failure while transiting First Narrows in Vancouver, BC. Both anchors were dropped and the vessel was assisted in the vicinity by tugs. The vessel continued on its voyage after the crew conducted repairs.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Port-State-Control detentions1

Houston, Texas2 deficiencies
Jan 30, 2024US Coast Guard (Tokyo MOU)2 grounds for detention
Maintenance of the ship and; Oil accumulation in engine

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

55/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentions46

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age60

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~81,250t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 6.4 m · 98 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

4.48 m~62,433 t

4.8 m~65,569 t

5.12 m~68,705 t

5.44 m~71,841 t

5.76 m~74,978 t

6.08 m~78,114 t

6.4 m~81,250 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.10 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.1Beam/LOA 0.132Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial