TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Container Ship🇯🇵 JapanActive

MIKAGE

IMO
9815367
MMSI
431006885
Call Sign
JD3909

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
749GT
Deadweight
1,870DWT
Length Overall
95.5m
Beam
13.5m
Draught
3.9m
Year Built
2015

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 2 h ago
Track · last 6 d
Position
34.162°N · 134.782°E
Speed
12.2 kn
Course
226°
Status
Under way using engine
Destination >JP TKX OFFETA Jul 2, 08:30 AMLaden · 4.5 m

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreLow
84/ 100
Safety78
Compliance95
Environment78
Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (98% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Recent port calls

AIS-derived from our live feed.

Operational Status

Activity

Under wayLow confidenceFix 5 days ago

Making way at sea speed on its latest broadcast.

Speed
14.1 kn
Nav status
Under way using engine
Last broadcast
5 days ago
Hull age
11 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

44/100
Moderate risk60% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal80
Hull age24
Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~1,870t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 3.9 m · 8.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
2.73 m~914 t
2.93 m~1,073 t
3.12 m~1,232 t
3.32 m~1,392 t
3.51 m~1,551 t
3.7 m~1,711 t
3.9 m~1,870 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Container
Inferred from size
Container

density DWT/GT=2.50 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared container) — likely a tonnage data error

DWT/GT 2.5Beam/LOA 0.141Declared type: Container Ship

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 0.95

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
0.95
Beam Loa Ratio
0.141
Deadweight
1,870
Declared Class
CONTAINER
Declared Type
Container Ship
Dwt Gt Ratio
2.497
Gross Tonnage
749
Reason
density DWT/GT=2.50 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared container) — likely a tonnage data error
Size Implied Class
CONTAINER

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 1,870 DWT · ~9 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments