TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
General Cargo🇨🇦 CanadaActive

MITIQ

IMO
9081306
MMSI
316025029
Call Sign
CFN6556

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
8,448GT
Deadweight
12,760DWT
Length Overall
136m
Beam
19m
Year Built
1995

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh
58/ 100
Safety38
Compliance95
Environment38
Carbon intensity · 2024C
1,084t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
12
Fuel burned
347 t
Technical
EEXI (8.24 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties6
  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Jul 11, 2019Cap Saint-Michel, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 11 July 2019, the cargo vessel "MITIQ" experienced a problem with the vessel's main engine in the St. Lawrence River near Varennes, QC and proceeded to the anchorage. The crew carried out repairs and the vessel resumed its voyage.

  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Sep 20, 2016Port of Valleyfield, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 20 September 2016, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ" reported a breakdown of the cargo crane during cargo operations at berth, Port of Valleyfield, QC.

  • RISK OF COLLISION (near collision) - With another vessel or other floating objectMinor
    Aug 17, 2016Yamachice, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 17 August 2016, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ" reported a close quarters situation with the pleasure craft "C24801QC". The vessel had to take evasive actions to avoid the collision.

  • STRIKING - Allision with a fixed object (striking - includes berthed/docked vessels)Serious
    Sep 30, 2015In St. Lambert Lock, St. Lambert ,QC., QUEBEC (QC)

    On 30 September 2015, the general cargo "MITIQ" struck a protection pillar for one of the vacuum pads of the lock at St. Lambert, QC while mooring inside the lock. The vessel sustained damage, but no damage to the lock was reported.

  • PERSON SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED - In contact with any part of the ship or its contentsSerious
    Oct 28, 2014Arviat, NU, NUNAVUT (NU)

    On 28 October 2014, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ", while anchored off Arviat, Nunavut, reported having an injured crewmember. The crewmember was sent to the hospital for his injuries. No damage or pollution reported.

  • PERSON SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED - In contact with any part of the ship or its contentsSerious
    Oct 1, 2014Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 01 October 2014, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ" reported an injured stevedore while being alongside the dock in Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, Quebec. The casualty was sent to the hospital with a fracture to the left leg. No damage or pollution reported.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

70/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age100
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~12,760t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 7.57 m · 26.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
5.3 m~6,795 t
5.67 m~7,789 t
6.05 m~8,783 t
6.43 m~9,777 t
6.81 m~10,772 t
7.19 m~11,766 t
7.57 m~12,760 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 12,760 DWT · ~17 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments