Container Ship🇵🇦 PanamaActive

MSC CELINE

Compare

IMO: 9316361
MMSI: 373582000
Call Sign: 3FID6

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

32,060GT

Deadweight

39,000DWT

Length Overall

210.85m

Beam

32.29m

Draught

9.4m

Year Built

2007

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$23.6Mrange $20M – $25.3M

$605/dwt · 39,000 dwt · built 2007

high confidence · 10 comps

Comparable sales

BF TIGER 2006 · $20MNAJADE 2007 · $20MINTERSEA TRAVELER 2008 · $22.5MSTRAIT MAS 2002 · $19MAS PAOLA 2005 · $20.5MSANTA MARTA EXPRESS 2010 · $32M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

77/ 100

Safety68

Compliance95

Environment68

Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (71% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Jul 23, 2024Montréal, QUEBEC (QC)
On 23 July 2024, the container ship "MSC CELINE", while under the conduct of two pilots and assisted by two tugs, reported having sustained a total engine failure upon departure from section No. 66 of the Port de Montréal, QC. The vessel was secured alongside and the crew addressed the issue.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

64/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age56

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~39,000t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 9.4 m · 63 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

6.58 m~21,225 t

7.05 m~24,188 t

7.52 m~27,150 t

7.99 m~30,113 t

8.46 m~33,075 t

8.93 m~36,038 t

9.4 m~39,000 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.22 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.22Beam/LOA 0.153Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial