Container Ship🇵🇦 PanamaActive

MSC MONICA III

Compare

IMO: 9060649
MMSI: 351607000
Call Sign: 3FSU7

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

37,398GT

Deadweight

43,618DWT

Length Overall

243.3m

Beam

32.2m

Draught

10.3m

Year Built

1993

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$13.6Mrange $13.6M – $14.9M

$311/dwt · 43,618 dwt · built 1993

low confidence · 3 comps

Comparable sales

PALERMO 1998 · $11.9MBUXFAVOURITE 1997 · $10MNEWNEW MOON 1999 · $10.5M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreHigh

58/ 100

Safety38

Compliance95

Environment38

Carbon intensity · estimatedB

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band B from its segment, size and age (54% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

GROUNDING - Under power (non-intentional)Serious
Jan 22, 2016Deschaillons-sur-Saint-Laurent, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 22 January 2016, the container vessel "MSC MONICA" ran aground 1 nautical mile NNE of Deschaillons-sur-Saint-Laurent, QC. The vessel was refloated the following day, with the assistance of 3 tugs, and proceeded to Québec, QC to undergo the necessary inspections. The vessel sustained minor damage to its hull and major damage to the 4 propeller blades.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

90/100

High riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or a dark-fleet signal.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age100

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~43,618t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 10.3 m · 65.9 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7.21 m~23,254 t

7.73 m~26,648 t

8.24 m~30,042 t

8.76 m~33,436 t

9.27 m~36,830 t

9.79 m~40,224 t

10.3 m~43,618 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.17 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.17Beam/LOA 0.132Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial