Container Ship🇵🇦 PanamaActive

MSC NILGUN

Compare

IMO: 9051492
MMSI: 357191000
Call Sign: H8MU

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

30,971GT

Deadweight

42,413DWT

Length Overall

202m

Beam

32.24m

Draught

11.2m

Year Built

1994

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$13.2Mrange $13.2M – $14.5M

$311/dwt · 42,413 dwt · built 1994

low confidence · 3 comps

Comparable sales

PALERMO 1998 · $11.9MBUXFAVOURITE 1997 · $10MNEWNEW MOON 1999 · $10.5M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreHigh

58/ 100

Safety38

Compliance95

Environment38

Carbon intensity · 2023B

14,072t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 8.2
Fuel burned: 4,457 t
Technical: EEXI (14.01 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Mar 3, 2016In Montreal Harbour, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 03 March 2016, the container vessel "MSC NILGUN” sustained an engine failure on departure from section 48 of the Montreal harbor. Assisted by two tug anchored in the Montreal East anchorage, the vessel then berthed at section 98 for repairs. The crew operated the engine in local mode and the vessel resumed its transit.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

90/100

High riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or a dark-fleet signal.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age100

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~42,413t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 11.2 m · 58.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7.84 m~22,905 t

8.4 m~26,156 t

8.96 m~29,408 t

9.52 m~32,659 t

10.08 m~35,910 t

10.64 m~39,162 t

11.2 m~42,413 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.37 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.37Beam/LOA 0.16Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial