TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
General Cargo🇷🇺 RussiaActive

NIKIFOR BEGICHEV

IMO
9014896
MMSI
273382350
Call Sign
UIFL

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
7,949GT
Deadweight
12,239DWT
Length Overall
129.6m
Beam
19.4m
Draught
5.3m
Year Built
1991

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh
51/ 100
Safety38
Compliance75
Environment38

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties2
  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Dec 11, 2012ST. LAWRENCE RIVER, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 11 December 2012, the "APOLLOGRACHT" sustained two main engine failures and had to anchor at Yamachiche, then later near Pointe Platon, on the St-Lawrence River, Quebec. No damage, injuries or pollution reported.

  • TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
    Dec 2, 2012K-32, POINTE A MICHEL, QC, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 2 December 2012, the "APOLLOGRACHT" sustained a main engine failure, drifted for two hours while repairing, near Pointe a Michel, in the St-Laurence River. No damage, injuries, or pollution reported.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

70/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age100
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~12,239t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 5.3 m · 25.5 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
3.71 m~8,179 t
3.97 m~8,856 t
4.24 m~9,532 t
4.51 m~10,209 t
4.77 m~10,886 t
5.03 m~11,562 t
5.3 m~12,239 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 12,239 DWT · ~17 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.
NIKIFOR BEGICHEV

Visual Archive

Gallery

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments