TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
General Cargo🇳🇴 NorwayActive

OSLO BULK 4

IMO
9589956
MMSI
257432000
Call Sign
LAHB8

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
5,629GT
Deadweight
8,039DWT
Length Overall
108.21m
Beam
18.48m
Draught
4.6m
Year Built
2010

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreMedium
77/ 100
Safety68
Compliance95
Environment68
Carbon intensity · 2023C
1,286t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
18.1
Fuel burned
411 t
Technical
Not Applicable

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1
  • RISK OF STRIKING (near allision) - Risk of allision with a fixed object (striking - includes vessels)Minor
    Nov 19, 2013St-Louis de Gonzague, QUEBEC (QC)

    On 19 November 2013, the M/V "OSLO BULK 4" was involved in a risk of allision with the St-Louis de Gonzague's lift bridge in the Beauharnois Canal, St-Louis de Gonzague, QC.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

36/100
Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age44
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~8,039t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 4.6 m · 19.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
3.22 m~5,403 t
3.45 m~5,843 t
3.68 m~6,282 t
3.91 m~6,721 t
4.14 m~7,160 t
4.37 m~7,600 t
4.6 m~8,039 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 8,039 DWT · ~9 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments