Ro-Ro or Passenger Ship🇨🇦 CanadaActive

PETER FRASER

Compare

IMO: 8674778
MMSI: 316025359

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

291GT

Deadweight

214DWT

Length Overall

33.6m

Beam

12m

Year Built

2013

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreLow

84/ 100

Safety78

Compliance95

Environment78

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties5

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Aug 10, 2023L'Isle-Verte, QUEBEC (QC)
On 10 August 2023, the ferry "PETER-FRASER" reported having sustained a total failure of its propulsion system while secured in L'Isle-Verte, QC. The vessel proceeded with its daily schedule and a technician was contracted to resolve the issue.
BOTTOM CONTACTMinor
Jul 13, 2023Le Bout d'en Bas, QUEBEC (QC)
On 13 July 2023, the ferry "PETER-FRASER" reported having made contact with the bottom while crossing the St. Lawrence River off L'Isle-Verte, QC. The crew determined that there was no water ingress and the vessel proceeded to Notre-Dame-des-Sept-Douleurs, QC.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Jul 5, 2022La Richardière, QUEBEC (QC)
On 05 July 2022, the ro-ro ferry "PETER-FRASER" reported sustaining a failure of its propulsion system in the St. Lawrence River off Île Verte, QC. The vessel subsequently underwent repairs and resumed operations the following day.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Sep 20, 2020L'Isle-Verte, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 20 September 2020, the ferry "PETER-FRASER" reported the failure of one of its electrical generators at L'Isle-Verte, QC.
GROUNDING - Under power (non-intentional)Serious
May 19, 2017Rivière Verte, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 19 May 2017, the passenger ferry "PETER FRASER" went aground off Rivière Verte, QC. The vessel was refloated the next day and proceeded to dock at Isle Verte, QC. Damage was reported to the vessel's hull and cooling system.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

29/100

Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age32

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~214t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 2.17 m · 1.6 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

1.52 m~113 t

1.63 m~129 t

1.74 m~146 t

1.84 m~163 t

1.95 m~180 t

2.06 m~197 t

2.17 m~214 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial