Tanker🇨🇭 SwitzerlandActive

PIZ EVEREST

Compare

IMO: 7324869
MMSI: 269057296
Call Sign: HE7296

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

1,556GT

Deadweight

1,372DWT

Length Overall

101.46m

Beam

Draught

2.6m

Year Built

1973

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh

58/ 100

Safety38

Compliance95

Environment38

Composite Risk

Risk Score

56/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal50

Hull age100

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~1,372t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 2.6 m · 5 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

1.82 m~985 t

1.95 m~1,050 t

2.08 m~1,114 t

2.21 m~1,179 t

2.34 m~1,243 t

2.47 m~1,308 t

2.6 m~1,372 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.88 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit; beam/LOA=0.089 is fine-lined

DWT/GT 0.88Beam/LOA 0.089Declared type: Tanker

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchmediumstrength 0.52

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.521
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.089
Deadweight: 1,372
Declared Class: TANKER
Declared Type: Tanker
Dwt Gt Ratio: 0.882
Gross Tonnage: 1,556
Reason: declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.88 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit; beam/LOA=0.089 is fine-lined
Size Implied Class: GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial