Oil Products Tanker🇲🇾 MalaysiaActive

RAHMAT

Compare

IMO: 9078921
MMSI: 533005700
Call Sign: 9MWS5

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

699GT

Deadweight

1,873DWT

Length Overall

75m

Beam

11.2m

Draught

4.5m

Year Built

1993

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh

58/ 100

Safety38

Compliance95

Environment38

Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (100% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

69/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal80

Hull age100

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~1,873t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 4.5 m · 5.7 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

3.15 m~1,104 t

3.38 m~1,232 t

3.6 m~1,360 t

3.82 m~1,488 t

4.05 m~1,617 t

4.27 m~1,745 t

4.5 m~1,873 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=2.68 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared tanker) — likely a tonnage data error

DWT/GT 2.68Beam/LOA 0.149Declared type: Oil Products Tanker

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 0.95

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.95
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.149
Deadweight: 1,873
Declared Class: TANKER
Declared Type: Oil Products Tanker
Dwt Gt Ratio: 2.68
Gross Tonnage: 699
Reason: density DWT/GT=2.68 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared tanker) — likely a tonnage data error
Size Implied Class: TANKER

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial