- IMO
- 9085730
- MMSI
- 273390290
- Call Sign
- UBBP7
Technical Specifications
Key Figures
Intelligence
Risk & Sustainability
Compliance
Safety Record
- PERSON SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED - Boarding, being on board, falling overboard from the shipSeriousJul 19, 2010BECANCOUR, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 19 July 2010, while loading locomotives in the Port of Becancour, Quebec, on the St.Lawrence River, a stevedore fell between the M/V "STELLANOVA" and the quay. The victim was near a safety ladder in the quay and able to climb back to safety.
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorOct 23, 2007BUOY D-42, LAKE ST.FRANCOIS, QUEBEC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 23 October 2007, the up bound vessel STELLANOVA had steering problems off Lancaster, Ontario, near buoy D-42 on the Lake St. Francois.
- COLLISION - With another vessel or other floating objectSeriousOct 12, 2002SOUTH SHORE CANAL, ST.LAWRENCE, QUE., QUEBEC (QC)
At approximately 1850 eastern daylight time on 12 October 2002, the upbound Stellanova was going west through the South Shore Canal on the St. Lawrence Seaway while the downbound Canadian Prospector was preparing to enter the South Shore Canal eastbound just after transiting Lake St. Louis. As it approached Mile 12, the Stellanova was on the south side of the channel when the pilot called the Canadian Prospector and arranged a starboard-to-starboard passing. The master of the Canadian Prospector concurred with the arrangement and manoeuvred the vessel towards the north side of the channel. The Stellanova was manoeuvred in order to keep it on the south side of the channel, but it sheered towards the centre of the channel, and the Stellanova and the Canadian Prospector collided. Both vessels sustained significant damage. The Stellanova struck the bank, causing minor pollution, which was eventually brought under control by St. Lawrence Seaway authorities. One member of the Stellanova crew sustained minor injuries as a result of the impact.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Composite Risk
Risk Score
Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or a dark-fleet signal.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 4 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Capacity & Classification
Other · summer draught 5.75 m · 14.1 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
Transparency
Risk signals
Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.
Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front
- On Sanctions List
- yes
- Regimes
- OFAC
Method: vessel is on a sanctions list but has never appeared on our live AIS feed. Source: ais_positions (absence) + sanctioned_vessels.
Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.
Commercial
Voyage Estimate
Explore More
Similar Vessels
Community
Vessel Comments