Container Ship🇵🇦 PanamaActive

SAN FRANCISCO BRIDGE

Compare

IMO: 9560364
MMSI: 355400000
Call Sign: 3FPV6

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

71,787GT

Deadweight

72,890DWT

Length Overall

293.18m

Beam

40m

Draught

11.8m

Year Built

2010

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$63.2Mrange $63M – $69.4M

$867/dwt · 72,890 dwt · built 2010

high confidence · 11 comps

Comparable sales

HYUNDAI PRIVILEGE 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PREMIUM 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PLATINUM 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PRESTIGE 2013 · $60MHYUNDAI PARAMOUNT 2013 · $60MGENOA EXPRESS 2014 · $45M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

77/ 100

Safety68

Compliance95

Environment68

Carbon intensity · estimatedB

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band B from its segment, size and age (57% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

STRIKING - Allision with a fixed object (striking - includes berthed/docked vessels)Serious
Oct 24, 2017Delta Port Terminal, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 24 October 2017, the container vessel "SAN FRANCISCO BRIDGE", under the conduct of a pilot, made a hard landing while berthing at Delta Port Terminal, BC. There was minor damage to the vessel's hull and to the wharf.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

56/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age44

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~72,890t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 11.8 m · 96.7 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

8.26 m~38,672 t

8.85 m~44,375 t

9.44 m~50,078 t

10.03 m~55,781 t

10.62 m~61,484 t

11.21 m~67,187 t

11.8 m~72,890 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.02 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.02Beam/LOA 0.136Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial