TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Oil Products Tanker🇪🇨 EcuadorActive

SANTIAGO

Built by HD Hyundai Mipo in 1999

IMO
9174373
MMSI
735057549
Call Sign
HCSA

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
27,607GT
Deadweight
45,274DWT
Length Overall
183.07m
Beam
32.2m
Year Built
1999

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$13.3Mrange $9.7M$15.4M
$293/dwt · 45,274 dwt · built 1999
high confidence · 38 comps
Comparable sales
ARSOS M 2004 · $16MSPARKLE 2004 · $14.5MGT FREEDOM 2003 · $8.5MBUTTERFLY 2004 · $18MTORM HELVIG 2005 · $18MBRUNO 2004 · $17.5M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$8.4Mrange $7.1M$11.3M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
64/ 100
Safety48
Compliance95
Environment48
Carbon intensity · estimatedD

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band D from its segment, size and age (64% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

63/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age88
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~45,274t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.15 m · 51.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
7.8 m~27,934 t
8.36 m~30,824 t
8.92 m~33,714 t
9.48 m~36,604 t
10.03 m~39,494 t
10.59 m~42,384 t
11.15 m~45,274 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.64 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.64Beam/LOA 0.176Declared type: Oil Products Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 45,274 DWT · ~30 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments