Passenger🇦🇫 AfghanistanActive

SCUBA NET

Compare

MMSI: 401001558

Composite Risk

Risk Score

0/100

Low riskLow confidence20% component coverage

No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull ageno data

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the single component we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Transparency

Flag history

Every recorded change of registered flag for this vessel. None of these changes matched a risk pattern. Re-flagging is a normal commercial act; this is an informational record, not a determination of wrongdoing.

United Kingdom→China
Mar 22, 2023
Source: Clarkson Research.

Flag changes are taken verbatim from the vessel's recorded history; the “flagged” marker is a transparent rule over a public open-registry list and a documented re-flagging cadence, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial