Floating Storage or Production🇧🇭 BahrainActive

SEAPEAK BAHRAIN

Built by Hanwha Ocean in 2018

Compare

IMO: 9771080
MMSI: 408919000
Call Sign: A9LV

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

113,274GT

Deadweight

95,289DWT

Length Overall

294.9m

Beam

46.44m

Draught

11.8m

Year Built

2018

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$60.6Mrange $52.5M – $63.8M

$636/dwt · 95,289 dwt · built 2018

high confidence · 21 comps

Comparable sales

RAFFLES HARMONY 2013 · $41.9MPUSAKA JAVA 2018 · $69MSOUTHERN REVERENCE 2018 · $75MFS DILIGENCE 2012 · $86MKMARIN RENOWN 2016 · $46MALKINOOS 2019 · $73M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$56.9Mrange $43.5M – $56.9M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow

90/ 100

Safety88

Compliance95

Environment88

Carbon intensity · 2024B

42,052t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 5.6
Fuel burned: 15,784 t
Technical: EEXI (3.09 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

26/100

Moderate risk60% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal50

Hull age12

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~95,289t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.8 m · 106 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

8.26 m~57,779 t

8.85 m~64,031 t

9.44 m~70,282 t

10.03 m~76,534 t

10.62 m~82,786 t

11.21 m~89,037 t

11.8 m~95,289 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.84 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit

DWT/GT 0.84Beam/LOA 0.157Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchmediumstrength 0.52

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.522
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.158
Deadweight: 95,289
Declared Class: TANKER
Declared Type: Floating Storage or Production
Dwt Gt Ratio: 0.841
Gross Tonnage: 113,274
Reason: declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.84 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit
Size Implied Class: GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial