Container Ship🇭🇰 Hong KongActive

SINGAPORE EXPRESS

Compare

IMO: 9200809
Call Sign: VRNE9

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

54,401GT

Deadweight

66,793DWT

Length Overall

294.06m

Beam

32.2m

Year Built

2000

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$2.1Mrange $2.1M – $2.1M

$31/dwt · 66,793 dwt · built 2000

medium confidence · 4 comps

Comparable sales

MSC TIA V 2002 · $1.6MSFT SAUDI 2001 · $1.6MSFT TURKEY 2003 · $1.6MSFT EGYPT 2003 · $1.6M

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

64/ 100

Safety48

Compliance95

Environment48

Carbon intensity · estimatedB

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band B from its segment, size and age (63% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

RISK OF COLLISION (near collision) - With another vessel or other floating objectModerate
Jan 23, 2020Victoria, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 23 January 2020, the container vessel "CAP CAPRICORN", under the conduct of a pilot, reported a close quarters situation with the unpiloted container vessel "SINGAPORE EXPRESS" in Constance Bank, Victoria, BC. The "CAP CAPRICORN" took evasive action to avoid a collision.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

70/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age84

Flag register50

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~66,793t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 12.21 m · 85.4 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

8.55 m~35,507 t

9.16 m~40,721 t

9.77 m~45,936 t

10.38 m~51,150 t

10.99 m~56,364 t

11.6 m~61,579 t

12.21 m~66,793 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.23 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.23Beam/LOA 0.109Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial