Floating Storage or Production🇲🇾 MalaysiaActive

TENAGA SATU

Compare

IMO: 7428457
MMSI: 533189000
Call Sign: 9MUO

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

80,510GT

Deadweight

70,948DWT

Length Overall

280.62m

Beam

41.6m

Year Built

1982

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh

58/ 100

Safety38

Compliance95

Environment38

Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (39% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

56/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal50

Hull age100

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~70,948t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 12.82 m · 70.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

8.98 m~43,988 t

9.62 m~48,481 t

10.26 m~52,974 t

10.9 m~57,468 t

11.54 m~61,961 t

12.18 m~66,455 t

12.82 m~70,948 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.88 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit; beam/LOA=0.148 is fine-lined

DWT/GT 0.88Beam/LOA 0.148Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchmediumstrength 0.52

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.522
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.148
Deadweight: 70,948
Declared Class: TANKER
Declared Type: Floating Storage or Production
Dwt Gt Ratio: 0.881
Gross Tonnage: 80,510
Reason: declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.88 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit; beam/LOA=0.148 is fine-lined
Size Implied Class: GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial