TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Chemical Tanker🇹🇻 TuvaluActive

THERESA TIGA

IMO
9146039
Call Sign
T2WH4

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
12,148GT
Deadweight
18,523DWT
Length Overall
149.5m
Beam
24m
Draught
9.4m
Year Built
1996

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$7.7Mrange $6.4M$9.3M
$417/dwt · 18,523 dwt · built 1996
medium confidence · 6 comps
Comparable sales
BOW OCEANIC 1997 · $6MNobler 2002 · $10MNOBLER 2002 · $10MGINGA KITE 2001 · $6MGINGA HAWK 2000 · $6.9MADELINE 1999 · $5.5M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$7Mrange $5.6M$9.6M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
64/ 100
Safety48
Compliance93
Environment48
Carbon intensity · estimatedD

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band D from its segment, size and age (47% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

70/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age100
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~18,523t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 9.4 m · 26.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
6.58 m~11,109 t
7.05 m~12,344 t
7.52 m~13,580 t
7.99 m~14,816 t
8.46 m~16,052 t
8.93 m~17,287 t
9.4 m~18,523 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.52 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.52Beam/LOA 0.161Declared type: Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 18,523 DWT · ~17 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments