General Cargo🇹🇿 TanzaniaActive

TITANIA

Compare

IMO: 7359204
MMSI: 677021900
Call Sign: 3EMAI7

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

3,136GT

Deadweight

4,743DWT

Length Overall

97m

Beam

15m

Draught

4.1m

Year Built

1975

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh

58/ 100

Safety38

Compliance95

Environment38

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties2

SUSTAINS DAMAGE RENDER UNSEAWORTHY/UNFIT FOR PURPOSE - Unfit for purpose - ice, weather, etc.Serious
Mar 12, 1992DALHOUSIE HARBOUR, N.B.
SUSTAINED BULB. BOW DAMAGE IN ICE. Note: formerly OccNo : 1300-5-92
PERSON SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED - In contact with any part of the ship or its contentsSerious
Sep 12, 1978EAST COAST-CANADA-ST LAWRENCE-RIVIERE DU LOUP
ASSISTANT ENGINEER FELL INTO HOLD-SUSTAINING FRACTURES TO ANKLES. Note: formerly OccNo : 9704-7

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

90/100

High riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or a dark-fleet signal.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age100

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~4,743t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 4.1 m · 13.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

2.87 m~3,112 t

3.07 m~3,383 t

3.28 m~3,655 t

3.48 m~3,927 t

3.69 m~4,199 t

3.89 m~4,471 t

4.1 m~4,743 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial