Floating Storage or Production🇹🇷 TurkeyActive

TURQUOISE P

Compare

IMO: 9823883
MMSI: 271050049
Call Sign: TCA6950

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

109,777GT

Deadweight

93,715DWT

Length Overall

294m

Beam

46m

Year Built

2019

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$59.6Mrange $54.4M – $62.6M

$636/dwt · 93,715 dwt · built 2019

high confidence · 20 comps

Comparable sales

RAFFLES HARMONY 2013 · $41.9MARISTARCHOS 2017 · $44MPUSAKA JAVA 2018 · $69MSOUTHERN REVERENCE 2018 · $75MKMARIN RENOWN 2016 · $46MALKINOOS 2019 · $73M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$58.8Mrange $49.6M – $58.8M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow

90/ 100

Safety88

Compliance95

Environment88

Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (72% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

25/100

Low risk60% component coverage

No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal50

Hull age8

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~93,715t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 13.98 m · 84.5 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

9.79 m~58,276 t

10.49 m~64,183 t

11.19 m~70,089 t

11.88 m~75,996 t

12.58 m~81,902 t

13.28 m~87,809 t

13.98 m~93,715 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.85 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit

DWT/GT 0.85Beam/LOA 0.156Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchmediumstrength 0.49

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.491
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.157
Deadweight: 93,715
Declared Class: TANKER
Declared Type: Floating Storage or Production
Dwt Gt Ratio: 0.854
Gross Tonnage: 109,777
Reason: declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.85 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit
Size Implied Class: GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial