Oil or Chemical Tanker🇨🇱 ChileActive

BRIO

Built by HD Hyundai Mipo in 2013

Compare

IMO: 9655913
MMSI: 725001963
Call Sign: CBBR

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

29,708GT

Deadweight

49,990DWT

Length Overall

183.31m

Beam

32.23m

Draught

8.3m

Year Built

2013

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$31Mrange $20.9M – $37M

$620/dwt · 49,990 dwt · built 2013

high confidence · 57 comps

Comparable sales

STI OSCEOLA 2015 · $35MSTI SENECA 2015 · $35MSTI BATTERY 2014 · $32MSTI TEXAS CITY 2014 · $42.5MSTI SAN ANTONIO 2014 · $42.5MSTI OPERA 2014 · $41M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$30.7Mrange $23.5M – $32.2M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow

84/ 100

Safety78

Compliance95

Environment78

Carbon intensity · estimatedA

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band A from its segment, size and age (60% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Build Series

Sister Vessels

1 sister

HD Hyundai Mipo · TANKER · 2013 · 2-hull series

PIONEROS

Built 201349,990 DWTIMO 9650573

Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

19/100

Low riskLow confidence40% component coverage

No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age32

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~49,990t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 8.3 m · 55.4 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

5.81 m~36,193 t

6.23 m~38,493 t

6.64 m~40,792 t

7.06 m~43,092 t

7.47 m~45,391 t

7.89 m~47,691 t

8.3 m~49,990 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.68 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.68Beam/LOA 0.176Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial