TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Crude Oil Tanker🇸🇦 Saudi ArabiaActive

DAFFODIL

IMO
9239927
MMSI
403127000
Call Sign
HZKQ

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
56,899GT
Deadweight
99,999DWT
Length Overall
248m
Beam
43.04m
Year Built
2002

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$25.9Mrange $19.3M$28M
$259/dwt · 99,999 dwt · built 2002
high confidence · 56 comps
Comparable sales
MINERVA IRIS 2004 · $20MMINERVA LISA 2004 · $20MEMERALD I 2007 · $38MLAMBADA 2006 · $32MSOFIA II 2008 · $31MSOFIA II 2008 · $32.2M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$19.4Mrange $16.5M$24M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
71/ 100
Safety58
Compliance95
Environment58
Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (80% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

56/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age76
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~99,999t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 14.27 m · 88.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
9.99 m~62,227 t
10.7 m~68,522 t
11.41 m~74,818 t
12.13 m~81,113 t
12.84 m~87,408 t
13.55 m~93,704 t
14.27 m~99,999 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.76 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.76Beam/LOA 0.174Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 99,999 DWT · ~38 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments