Crude Oil Tanker🇬🇼 Guinea-BissauActive

DE XI

Compare

IMO: 9308089
MMSI: 630001233
Call Sign: J5BA6

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

41,994GT

Deadweight

73,917DWT

Length Overall

228.6m

Beam

32.57m

Draught

Year Built

2006

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$19.3Mrange $13.5M – $21.7M

$261/dwt · 73,917 dwt · built 2006

high confidence · 43 comps

Comparable sales

CONQUEST 2006 · $11MHAMBURG STAR 2005 · $10MAMALIA 2006 · $11.5MCHEMTRANS ADRIATIC 2005 · $10MTWO MILLION WAYS 2008 · $30MATHIRI 2010 · $24.5M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$19.2Mrange $13.1M – $26.3M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

77/ 100

Safety68

Compliance95

Environment68

Carbon intensity · 2024C

13,859t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 4.5
Fuel burned: 4,418 t
Technical: EEXI (4.08 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Jun 5, 2017Terminal Dock, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 05 June 2017, the tanker "NEW CONQUEST" reported as disabled with an air lock problem in Vancouver Harbour, BC. The assist tugs were tethered to the vessel at the time and remained tethered until the crew carried out the repairs.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

46/100

Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age60

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~73,917t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 8 m · 72 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

5.6 m~56,627 t

6 m~59,508 t

6.4 m~62,390 t

6.8 m~65,272 t

7.2 m~68,154 t

7.6 m~71,035 t

8 m~73,917 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.76 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.76Beam/LOA 0.142Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial