Oil or Chemical Tanker🇮🇹 ItalyActive

ELECTA

Compare

IMO: 9416824
MMSI: 247284500
Call Sign: ICBQ

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

29,712GT

Deadweight

51,117DWT

Length Overall

183m

Beam

31.03m

Draught

11.4m

Year Built

2009

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$20.7Mrange $16.4M – $29.1M

$405/dwt · 51,117 dwt · built 2009

high confidence · 58 comps

Comparable sales

PS AUGUSTA 2011 · $26MPS QUEEN 2006 · $28MTORM RESILIENCE 2005 · $15MGREEN SEA 2014 · $38.8MNAVE EQUINOX 2007 · $14.4MNAVE EQUINOX 2007 · $14M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$21.7Mrange $17.3M – $25.1M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

77/ 100

Safety68

Compliance95

Environment68

Carbon intensity · 2024B

7,510t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 6.5
Fuel burned: 2,389 t
Technical: EEXI (4.91 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

RISK OF COLLISION (near collision) - With another vessel or other floating objectMinor
Dec 10, 2016Terminal Dock, Vancouver, BC, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 10 December 2016, the chemical tanker "ELECTA", under the conduct of a pilot, reported a close quarter situation with a crab fishing vessel in Burrard Inlet, BC. The chemical tanker took evasive action to avoid a collision.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

29/100

Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age48

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~51,117t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.4 m · 56.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7.98 m~31,881 t

8.55 m~35,087 t

9.12 m~38,293 t

9.69 m~41,499 t

10.26 m~44,705 t

10.83 m~47,911 t

11.4 m~51,117 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.72 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.72Beam/LOA 0.17Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial