TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Crude Oil Tanker🇨🇰 Cook IslandsActive

EM VITALITY

Built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Kobe Shipyard & Machinery Works in 1996

IMO
9102265
Call Sign
E5U3708

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
163,882GT
Deadweight
300,361DWT
Length Overall
340m
Beam
56.04m
Year Built
1996

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$31.4Mrange $29.2M$31.4M
$104/dwt · 300,361 dwt · built 1996
medium confidence · 4 comps
Comparable sales
ABIE 2002 · $41MSAFWA 2002 · $31.7MDENNIE 2000 · $30MTRICIA II 2000 · $21M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$40.7Mrange $32M$43.3M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreHigh
48/ 100
Safety48
Compliance47
Environment48
Carbon intensity · estimatedA

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band A from its segment, size and age (77% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

100/100
High riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or a dark-fleet signal.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age100
Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~300,361t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 20.09 m · 184.6 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
14.06 m~189,073 t
15.07 m~207,621 t
16.07 m~226,169 t
17.08 m~244,717 t
18.08 m~263,265 t
19.09 m~281,813 t
20.09 m~300,361 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.83 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.83Beam/LOA 0.165Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 300,361 DWT · ~70 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments