TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Crude Oil Tanker🇬🇷 GreeceActive

MARAN LUPUS

Built by Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding in 2009

IMO
9418066
MMSI
241724000
Call Sign
SVDJ2

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
164,680GT
Deadweight
318,080DWT
Length Overall
332m
Beam
60m
Draught
11.2m
Year Built
2009

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$53.9Mrange $43.3M$67.4M
$170/dwt · 318,080 dwt · built 2009
high confidence · 58 comps
Comparable sales
NIERUS 2003 · $30MSEASILK 2006 · $57MDHT SCANDINAVIA 2006 · $43.3MDHT CHINA 2007 · $101.6MWAFRAH 2007 · $40MCAESAR 2009 · $70M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$72.1Mrange $61.7M$87.8M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
77/ 100
Safety68
Compliance95
Environment68
Carbon intensity · 2023A
14,019t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
2.7
Fuel burned
4,481 t
Technical
EEXI (2.13 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

49/100
Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age48
Flag register50

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~318,080t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.2 m · 191.9 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
7.84 m~253,612 t
8.4 m~264,357 t
8.96 m~275,101 t
9.52 m~285,846 t
10.08 m~296,591 t
10.64 m~307,335 t
11.2 m~318,080 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.93 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.93Beam/LOA 0.181Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 318,080 DWT · ~70 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments