Oil or Chemical Tanker🇻🇨 Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesActive

NICOS I.V.

Compare

IMO: 9103843
MMSI: 377489000
Call Sign: J8B6334

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

31,183GT

Deadweight

44,990DWT

Length Overall

183m

Beam

32.23m

Year Built

2002

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$14.8Mrange $13.3M – $16.4M

$330/dwt · 44,990 dwt · built 2002

high confidence · 60 comps

Comparable sales

PELAGIC TARPON 2006 · $14MMARITIME JINGAN 2003 · $9MMARITIME VANESSA 2002 · $8.5MMARITIME SUZANNE 2002 · $8.5MELIJAH 2007 · $21MARSOS M 2004 · $16M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$10.2Mrange $8.7M – $12.5M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance94

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (53% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions1

Port Arthur, Texas7 deficiencies
Jul 18, 2017US Coast Guard (Tokyo MOU)7 grounds for detention
Oil record book The Oil Record Book Part II should be completed on; Oil record book The Oil Record Book Part II shall be completed on each; Safety and environmental; Stability/strength Each watertight bulkhead, whether transverse or; Holds and tanks Vessel shall be maintained in accordance with structural; Company verification, review; Oil record book The Oil Record Book Part II shall be complete on each

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

66/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentions49

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age76

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~44,990t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.13 m · 51.6 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7.79 m~27,757 t

8.35 m~30,629 t

8.9 m~33,501 t

9.46 m~36,373 t

10.01 m~39,246 t

10.57 m~42,118 t

11.13 m~44,990 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.44 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.44Beam/LOA 0.176Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial