TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Bulk Carrier🇺🇸 USAActive

PHILIP R.CLARKE

IMO
5277062
MMSI
366971350
Call Sign
WDH7554

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
11,623GT
Deadweight
27,129DWT
Length Overall
228.37m
Beam
21.34m
Year Built
1952

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh
58/ 100
Safety38
Compliance95
Environment38

Composite Risk

Risk Score

74/100
Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal80
Hull age100
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~27,129t at summer draught

Bulker · summer draught 9.56 m · 36 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
6.69 m~16,798 t
7.17 m~18,520 t
7.64 m~20,242 t
8.12 m~21,964 t
8.6 m~23,685 t
9.08 m~25,407 t
9.56 m~27,129 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Bulker
Inferred from size
Bulker

density DWT/GT=2.33 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared bulker) — likely a tonnage data error

DWT/GT 2.33Beam/LOA 0.093Declared type: Bulk Carrier

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 0.95

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
0.95
Beam Loa Ratio
0.093
Deadweight
27,129
Declared Class
BULKER
Declared Type
Bulk Carrier
Dwt Gt Ratio
2.334
Gross Tonnage
11,623
Reason
density DWT/GT=2.33 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared bulker) — likely a tonnage data error
Size Implied Class
BULKER

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 27,129 DWT · ~24 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments