Oil or Chemical Tanker🇳🇬 NigeriaActive

ST ZEE ZEE

Compare

IMO: 9241815
MMSI: 657164300
Call Sign: 5OAQ3

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

25,382GT

Deadweight

40,083DWT

Length Overall

175.95m

Beam

31.03m

Year Built

2003

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$13.6Mrange $11.8M – $15.5M

$339/dwt · 40,083 dwt · built 2003

high confidence · 59 comps

Comparable sales

MARINER A 2005 · $12MPRELUDE 2007 · $14MVALLE DI CORDOBA 2005 · $12.5MVALLE DI GRANADA 2005 · $13.4MALLEGRA 2009 · $24MHARRIS 2009 · $17.2M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$11Mrange $8.9M – $13.6M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (80% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
May 26, 2016St Simeon, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 26 May 2016, the chemical tanker "CIELO DI MILANO" became disabled due to a steering gear pump failure on the St-Lawrence River, off Saint-Simeon, QC. The crew carried out repairs at anchor and the vessel resumed its transit.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

53/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age72

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~40,083t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 10.73 m · 47.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7.51 m~24,698 t

8.05 m~27,262 t

8.59 m~29,826 t

9.12 m~32,391 t

9.66 m~34,955 t

10.2 m~37,519 t

10.73 m~40,083 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.58 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.58Beam/LOA 0.176Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial