Oil or Chemical Tanker🇰🇾 Cayman IslandsActive

STOLT NORLAND

Built by Ankerløkken Verft in 2009

Compare

IMO: 9414060
MMSI: 319377000
Call Sign: ZCXG8

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

25,895GT

Deadweight

43,593DWT

Length Overall

182.72m

Beam

32.2m

Draught

10.9m

Year Built

2009

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$15.9Mrange $14M – $17M

$365/dwt · 43,593 dwt · built 2009

high confidence · 56 comps

Comparable sales

MARITIME JINGAN 2003 · $9MUOG KYMA 2011 · $25.5MPELAGIC TARPON 2006 · $14MELIJAH 2007 · $21MARSOS M 2004 · $16MSPARKLE 2004 · $14.5M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$19.3Mrange $16.7M – $22.3M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

77/ 100

Safety68

Compliance95

Environment68

Carbon intensity · 2024B

2,331t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 7.6
Fuel burned: 746 t
Technical: EEXI (5.31 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Build Series

Sister Vessels

1 sister

Ankerløkken Verft · TANKER · 2009–2010 · 2-hull series

STOLT BRELAND

Built 201043,475 DWTIMO 9414084

Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

59/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age48

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~43,593t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 10.9 m · 50.9 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7.63 m~26,954 t

8.18 m~29,727 t

8.72 m~32,500 t

9.27 m~35,273 t

9.81 m~38,047 t

10.36 m~40,820 t

10.9 m~43,593 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.68 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.68Beam/LOA 0.176Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial