TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Bulk Carrier🇸🇬 SingaporeActive

THOR INFINITY

IMO
9238466
MMSI
564724000
Call Sign
9V9071

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
30,303GT
Deadweight
52,383DWT
Length Overall
189.99m
Beam
32.26m
Draught
12.2m
Year Built
2002

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$8.8Mrange $7.8M$10.1M
$168/dwt · 52,383 dwt · built 2002
high confidence · 60 comps
Comparable sales
OCEAN PRINCESS 2002 · $7.4MZEIN 2001 · $7.2MTHOR INDEPENDENCE 2001 · $7MINTREPID 2005 · $9MBULK FREEDOM 2005 · $9.6MOCEAN PRINCE 2002 · $7M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$7.8Mrange $6.8M$8.4M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Bulker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
71/ 100
Safety58
Compliance95
Environment58
Carbon intensity · 2024C
5,486t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
4.9
Fuel burned
1,759 t
Technical
EEXI (4.32 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions2
  • New Orleans, Louisiana3 deficiencies
    May 1, 2024US Coast Guard (Tokyo MOU)3 grounds for detention

    Ready availability of fire; Fire fighting equipment and; Maintenance of the ship and

  • Corpus Christi, Texas1 deficiency
    Sep 29, 2023US Coast Guard (Tokyo MOU)1 ground for detention

    Fitness for duty - work and

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

66/100
Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentions66
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age76
Flag register50

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~52,383t at summer draught

Bulker · summer draught 12.2 m · 53.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
8.54 m~32,695 t
9.15 m~35,976 t
9.76 m~39,258 t
10.37 m~42,539 t
10.98 m~45,820 t
11.59 m~49,102 t
12.2 m~52,383 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Bulker
Inferred from size
Bulker

density DWT/GT=1.73 is consistent with declared bulker

DWT/GT 1.73Beam/LOA 0.17Declared type: Bulk Carrier

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 52,383 DWT · ~30 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments