- IMO
- 9508940
- MMSI
- 316040257
- Call Sign
- VAHS
Technical Specifications
Key Figures
Live Tracking
Current Position
Where it waited most
Most time stopped at Domburg — 5 d across 3 stays.
- 1Domburg5 d · 3×
- 2Skolwin3 d
- 3Gothenburg11 h
- 4Szczecin1 h
Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.
Intelligence
Risk & Sustainability
An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).
Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.
- AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
- 14.7
- Fuel burned
- 1,671 t
- Technical
- EEXI (10.1 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.
- Sandvik, Styrsö0.5 dJun 24, 2026
- Szczecin0.3 dJun 21, 2026
- Skolwin3.6 dJun 18, 2026
AIS-derived from our live feed.
Compliance
Safety Record
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorDec 19, 2024Lanoraie, QC., QUEBEC (QC)
On 19 December 2024, the chemical/products tanker "HINCH SPIRIT" experienced a problem with its pitch control off Lanoraie, Quebec. The vessel proceeded to Montreal, Quebec for repairs.
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorAug 16, 2023Pointe des Pères, QUEBEC (QC)
On 16 August 2023, the chemical tanker "HINCH SPIRIT", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having sustained a total failure of its steering system in the St. Lawrence River off Tracy, QC. The vessel resumed its voyage using its backup systems.
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorOct 5, 2020Montréal, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 05 October 2020, the chemical product tanker "HINCH SPIRIT" reported that one of its main engines had failed while the vessel was docked at section 94 in the Port of Montreal, QC. The crew members carried out repairs.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Operational Status
Activity
Stopped, anchored or moored on its latest broadcast — parked, not necessarily withdrawn.
Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.
Composite Risk
Risk Score
Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Capacity & Classification
Tanker · summer draught 6.3 m · 23.5 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.62 is consistent with declared tanker
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Commercial
Voyage Estimate
Explore More
Similar Vessels
Community
Vessel Comments