Technical Data
Port Specifications
- UNLOCODE
- CAMTR
- Port Type
- Container
- Terminals
- 4
- Berth Count
- 24
- Max Draught
- 11.3 m
- Country
- 🇨🇦 Canada
Conditions
Current Weather
Overview
About This Port
The farthest inland container port in the North Atlantic and Canada's second-largest port. Located 1,600 km from the sea on the St. Lawrence River.
Location
Coordinates
45.5167°N, 73.5500°W
View on Google Maps →External Resources
Official Website
Live Data
Port Congestion
30-Day Berth Occupancy Trend
Waiting Vessels Trend
Port-call activity
Arrivals, time in port and cargo operations detected from AIS — the position-inferred congestion signal, with the full dwell distribution rather than a single average.
- in port
- in port
- · 3 h
- · 3 h
- · 5 h
- in port
- · 18 h
- · 5 h
- · 16 h
- · 3 h
- · 4 h
- · 13 h
- · 29 h
- · 22 h
- · 5 h
- · 22 h
- · 3 h
- · 4 h
- · 25 h
- · 18 h
- · 5 h
- · 13 h
- · 3 h
- in port
- in port
- · 8 h
- · 19 h
- · 2.5 d
- in port
- · 7 h
Expected arrivals
15 inboundVessels underway broadcasting a destination that resolves to this port, closest first. Distance is the real sea route (around land and through canals); the computed ETA is at the vessel’s passage speed. The crew’s own reported ETA is shown alongside for comparison.
| Vessel | Type | Distance | Speed | ETA (computed) | Crew ETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEDERAL BALTIC | Bulk Carrier | 3 nm | 6.8 kn | 30 Jun | — |
| ONEGO OTRA | General Cargo | 18 nm | 10.6 kn | 30 Jun | 30 Jun |
| HARVEST SPIRIT | General Cargo | 42 nm | 8.6 kn | 30 Jun | 30 Jun |
| FEDERAL MINNESOTA | Bulk Carrier | 139 nm | 11.1 kn | 30 Jun | 1 Jul |
| DRAWSKO | Bulk Carrier | 515 nm | 12.4 kn | 2 Jul | 2 Jul |
| BBC UKRAINE | Heavy Lift Vessel | 2204 nm | 14.7 kn | 6 Jul | — |
| CLI PRIDE | General Cargo | 2530 nm | 11.8 kn | 9 Jul | 30 Jun |
| TORONTO EXPRESS | Container Ship | ~2571 nm | 13.3 kn | — | 7 Jul |
| FURE VYL | Oil or Chemical Tanker | 2576 nm | 10.8 kn | 10 Jul | 1 Jul |
| HEERENGRACHT | Heavy Lift Vessel | ~2582 nm | 14.1 kn | — | 7 Jul |
| CAJUN SUN | Oil or Chemical Tanker | ~2610 nm | 13.6 kn | — | 1 Jul |
| MELOI | Bulk Carrier | 2624 nm | 13.6 kn | 8 Jul | 4 Jul |
| EXEBORG | General Cargo | ~3129 nm | 8.3 kn | — | 4 Jul |
| AIOLOS | Crude Oil Tanker | 3280 nm | 13.7 kn | 10 Jul | 7 Jul |
| SLOMAN DISCHARGER | General Cargo | ~4385 nm | 13.8 kn | — | 17 Jul |
Network
Connectivity & hub role
How central Port of Montreal sits in the sea-route network we cover — a connectivity score across navigable distances. A higher score means the port is navigationally close to many other well-connected ports, the maritime signature of a hub.
Directly routable to 179 other covered ports.
- CAHalifax988 nm
- USNew York-New Jersey1,522 nm
- USPhiladelphia1,689 nm
- USNorfolk1,725 nm
- USAlexandria1,814 nm
- USCharleston2,046 nm
- USPort of Savannah2,101 nm
- ISReykjavik2,229 nm
Method. A connectivity score across our own route network: a port reads higher when it is navigationally close to many other well-connected ports. The score is rescaled 0–100 within the snapshot, so the single most-connected port reads 100. Distances are Suez / Panama / Malacca-aware navigable sea miles.
Coverage. The route network spans the 180 largest commercial ports, so this ranks hubs within that covered network, not against every port on earth. The number is deterministic — no confidence grade is invented. Computed Jun 30, 2026.
Risk & quality
Port risk & quality
A coverage-weighted blend of recorded Port-State-Control detentions, marine casualties and live congestion at Port of Montreal. Higher means more risk exposure for a ship calling here — it is a count of recorded events, not a judgement of the port's management.
Built from 67% of the three signals.
Method. Each signal is normalised to 0–10 against an empirical cap, then blended weighting safety (detentions 0.40, casualties 0.35) above operational congestion (0.25). A port is scored only on the signals it has data for, and the weights renormalise — a missing signal is never credited as a safe 0.
Coverage. PSC and casualty data here is regional (US, UK, Canada), so most ports show only congestion and carry a low-confidence flag. Detention/casualty counts come from a country-scoped name match (≈60% of US detentions resolve); unmatched records are dropped, not force-fit.
Detention and casualty signals are screened against open port-state-control and marine-casualty records, combined with our own AIS-derived congestion. Updated Jun 23, 2026.
Community
Port Comments